Wednesday, January 21, 2009

Andragogy & Assessments

I'm beginning to try to tie down my view of adult learners and how they interact with their academic assessments. Below is a short essay I wrote primarily for myself to get the thoughts moving in the direction they seem to be pushing me...

If this makes sense to anyone else at all, I'd love to hear that news.

Brief outline of Andragogy and Alternative Assessments

Andragogy, or principles of adult education, is primarily concerned with bringing the unique aspects of adult learners into the planning and execution of the teaching. Adult learners bring with them skills, experiences, successes and failures that play a role in their future learning, things that are not accounted for in pedagogy.
Another way of viewing this idea is that pedagogy centers on the teacher as the content expert and the student as the novice that needs to be directed through content in a prescribed manner. Andragogy places a different role upon the teacher. The teacher becomes a content-facilitator, serving more to guide the learner through experiences designed to make the content accessible to the learner.
Principles of Andragogy that underline this approach are widely recognized to be the following:
• Adults are not a blank slate and do best when participating in planning and evaluating their learning
• Experience is a valuable teacher for adults, including mistakes
• Adults need connections to the immediate relevance of the subject matter to their learning goals
• Learning to learn, or problem-centered approaches vs content-centered approaches, is more inline with the innate approach to learning of adults
Looking at these basic tenets, it is easy to see that professional schools do some of these very well, for example the experiential learning that takes place in lab or clinic, but it is also clear that there are areas within which we have yet to recognize the differences between child and adult learners.
Academic assessments in particular are an area where capitalizing on an adult’s ability to self-assess and evaluate their own work is underutilized. Assessments such as peer and self-evaluations using a rubric, or reflective blogging fall right into the arena of adult learners. Yet far too often assessments are limited to lengthy multiple choice examinations, which sadly fall at the very bottom of Bloom’s taxonomy, meaning they do not lead to transfer or synthesis of knowledge and sit squarely on recall alone. Recall of information is not necessarily the type of learning that needs to take place in professional school as much as learning how to navigate the field of study should be.
Perhaps by trusting in our learners more and trusting in our ability to guide them through their own discovery of their abilities and weakness we can build upon an andragogical foundation in professional schools instead of hoping to inspire the type of knowledge gain we would like while testing for simple recall.

7 comments:

  1. Great post!

    I realized as I'm reading this that, IMHO, most of what you're saying applies not only to professional schools, but also to college undergrads, high schoolers .... at what point, would you say, does someone stop being a "child learner" and become an "adult learner"?

    ReplyDelete
  2. One of the great Q's really. I think many of my sister's middle school students exhibit qualities of adult learners, but then, it is also true that many don't. I draw the line dependent on the individual, somewhere in high school.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Great post.

    What you describe as salient characteristics of adult learners I would argue could also be seen in college students, and even mature high school students. What separates these adult learners from the "child learners," I believe, is their ability to see themselves within the context of their world, to see themselves as capable of making/correcting mistakes (and yes being anxious about that), and their craving to make their learning relevant, active and connected to the outside world.

    Educators (of ANY kind of learner) should always strive to connect what happens inside the classroom to the outside, the very place that, as soon as our students are done with us, our students are going to test the knowledge we shared with them and take it for a spin. Saying that is just what adult learners want/need I think is too limiting...all learners need to know how to make their learning relevant to their lives...not just the old folks. :-)

    Because of their ability to see themselves in a larger context, you are correct, I believe, in suggesting that adult learners should be involved in the creation of tools to evaluate their work, to assess their learning... understanding of course that learning is a journey that (maddeningly) never ends. And therein lies the problem... How do we help them to assess their learning....something that will never be finished? that is a constant state of morphing?

    So what types of andragogical (yikes, is that word?) assessments have worked for you? Which ones haven't? I would be interested in hearing more about the evaluation tools you think "fit" the adult learner model and why.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I kid you not, guess what we are doing in 8th grade English this week? Students are presenting SELF-designed projects demonstrating mastery of four content standards. Guess what their peers are doing? Using a CLASS-created rubric to assess their peers. After each presentation we debrief the rubric and share our thoughts on the content/presentation. Is it great and engaging? YES! Are the 13/14 year olds using critical thinking skills and metacognition? YES! Can they ALWAYS fairly grade the girl that is now "going out" with their ex? Not really. As a middle school teacher, I have the rare delight to interact with young adults. It is such a treat to see them take on adult skills and roles, and then cry because, "If I did exactly what was asked, why didn't I get a 4 (exceeds standard)?" More and more, teacher training programs and professional development for young people are leaning more towards what you are defining as "andragogy": prior knowledge, existing skills, metacognition, connection to schema. It is interesting to read the responses of those arguing that mature high school students qualify. You are right, but are underestimating the abilities of your middle-schoolers. The challenge comes with the fact that all of them are at different points on the spectrum of maturity and the ability to think critically. Some need to be coddled, others take your instruction and develop their own knowledge into something far more advanced than you had hoped. While it is exciting and satisfying, it is also "pull your hair out" frustrating! I have to remind myself 20 times a day that they are really just kids, and that just because some of them are capable of advanced thinking and social skills, we are working together for them ALL to attain those abilities. What if we teamed up some kids from middle school with college students? How would that turn out?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Ever since I started learning about andragogy many years ago, I have been of the opinion that the principles of andragogy can be applied practically from cradle to grave. It's kind of like the debate about phonics versus whole language reading instruction -- why do we need to choose one or the other? Can't we use both according to the needs of the specific situation?

    If it were up to me, we'd tear down all the lecture halls and replace them with classrooms of the future -- plenty of social networking spaces -- work stations for individuals, pairs, small groups, and larger groups. We would focus on authentic learning experiences and assessments, and give last rights to and have a funeral for bubble sheet testing.

    It is astonishing to me that institutions of higher learning still hold on to lecture as the primary mode of teaching. What will it take to make a shift from passive to active learning?

    ReplyDelete
  6. All very interesting dialog. THank you. Let me go back to Gwen's intitial thoughts --which are great. What are best ways to "test" or assess that synthesis of knowledge (verus regurgitation) occurs? Especially, in continuing professional education seminars?

    ReplyDelete
  7. I have a question. Is Mike Holmes is an example? He brings his experience and knoweldge to help people with their houses.

    ReplyDelete